Professional Refactoring in C# & ASP.NET. Download short informational pieces and. Sign up for our free monthly newsletter. Develop professional native applications in C, C++, and Fortran for a variety of platforms including Windows, Linux, OS X, and the Solaris operating system. From faster code completion and refactoring for C/C++ and Qt files, including code completion and navigation for preprocessor directives and preprocessor blocks. Download Free Professional Refactoring In C# &Amp; Asp.Net Pdf. This document provides an overview of many of the new features for ASP.NET that are included in the.

Does anybody know a fully featured refactoring tool for C++ that works reliably with large code bases (some 100.000 lines)? I tried whatever i can find again and again over the last years: SlickEdit, Eclipse CDT.

They all were not at all usable. SUMMARY: I took time and evaluated 'Visual Assist X' as well as 'Refactor for C++'.

Both have some impressing features, but both as well are far from perfect. Extracting a large block of code usually is not done satisfying without manual modifications - and therefore does not pay off. 'Visual Assist X' has nice features such as much more complete autocompletition etc.

But it leads to so much flickering and slows down much at certain points. By my opinion therefore the answer is: 'No, there is no production ready refactoring tool for C++' UPDATE March 2015 As for hdoghmens reply today i tried Resharper for C++. His link does not say anything about C++. But i found Resharper C++ that was announced more than a year ago here: I gave it a try with VC2010 using a code base of 20MB. Test 1: Extract Method: results in a Resharper exception. No source code changed. Test 2: Extract Method with different source: Works fine Test 3: Change signature of extracted function: Results in broken C++ code: bool myclass::do_work123(int& Filled*&, long, int&) Maybe thats why C++ its not listed on the main page.

By my opinion the answer to this question still is 'NO'. Our is a transformation engine designed to carry out complex transforms over large bodies of code, including C++.

It has been used to make reliable changes on systems of millions of lines of code. It operates by using compiler-accurate langauges analyzers and transformers. It has a full C++ parser with name and type resolution, builds ASTs of code, can apply procedural or source-to-source transformations (with C++ surface syntax) to revise those trees, and regenerate compilable output with comments preserved.

(Edit: 7/1/2011: Now does C++1X to the extent we understand the standard:) It has been used on large scale reengineering projects, including C++ component re-architecting, and 100% fully automated translations between langauges. You can read about this at the website. DMS is also used to build arbitrary source analysis tools.

Examples include clone detection, test coverage, smart difference (comparision of source code structures and abstract editing operations rather than lines with simple insert and delete), etc. What it is not (presently) is an interactive refactoring tool. Ulead Photo Express 6 Crack Torrent. We believe that to do most refactorings well, you need deep control and data fow analyses. DMS has generic machinery to support this, and that machinery is implemented for C, COBOL and Java at this point, with C++ being next in line. This is a tough job. You won't see a lot of serious C++ refactoring tools from anybody until this kind of problem has been solved well. First you need a full C++ parser:-} EDIT 7/5/2011: Looks like we are going to take a run at the interactive version.

We have won a Department of Energy Phase I SBIR to investigate how to do this. See (Look for Semantic Designs under 'Texas'). Don't expect a result in a hurry; this is just the start of 3 phase multi-year program to get to a tool.

EDIT 8/11/2011: First progress. We now handle all of C++0x and OpenMP directives. EDIT 1/4/2012: Does full control flow analysis of C++ code.

EDIT 9/15/2014: Now have C++14 front end parser/transformation engine well in hand. Even does rename pretty reliably at this point:-}. Dunno what you mean by 'elegant output'. The output you get from DMS clearly depends on what you give it, and what transformations you apply. If the transformation don't touch part of the code, that part of the code is as elegant or not as it was in the first place.